Talking about “referendums”,
one should comment upon the newest one from Greece. That did receive much
international attention.
Some 61% of Greeks
voted on July 5 against a proposed arrangement by international negotiators to
“solve” the financial mess that their country had fallen into. The prime
minister of the Greeks, recently elected, Alexis Tsipiras, had urged his people
to vote against it, and they did. The idea of having such referendum had been
introduced only a few days earlier, its haste necessitated by the urgency of
the Greek financial problems. The fact that the proposed “settlement’ had been
passed by as useless, in the interim, did not faze the promoters of the vote.
Almost immediately
afterwards, the PM was required to back down to further restrictions. The vote
did nothing to alter the needs or requirements of the majority of the other
European leaders who were trying to rescue Greece from the financial mess that
their previous years’ transgressions had gotten them into. Rather obviously a
vote from the Greek people could not legally affect in any way the views and
opinions of other states, but at least the PM did clearly gather the views of
his citizens.
The Economist magazine
in its July11-17 issue analyzed the results. It showed that the views of males
and females were substantially the same – about 40% in favour, 60% opposed.
Those aged 18 to 24 were some 20% in favour, with 80% opposed, contrasted to
those 65 years and older, where some 55% were in favour, with 45% opposed.
It was pretty
clearly an opinion which substantiated the ideal of democracy – where the
majority opinion is supposed to prevail.
However, it does not
fit within the prescription which I would suggest is the only really proper
referendum – one initiated by the people not by the government. That sort of
referendum, ultimately binding upon the government jurisdiction about which the
issue relates, more effectively translates into majority, democratic views.
But, at least, the
idea of obtaining the views of the people from the country which invented
“democracy” is certainly an improvement over the most common manner of
establishing laws, that is, by an edict from a leader or approved by the few
elected representatives.
Too bad that in
Greece the elected representatives, over the past several years, had let the
country fall into such a financial mess from which its citizens could not, even
by their recent voting, lead it out.
No comments:
Post a Comment